Upload
Login or register
x
Anonymous comments allowed.
60 comments displayed.
User avatar #248 to #5 - kyouko (07/07/2015) [-]
TUCK FRUMP
#201 to #5 - anon (07/07/2015) [-]
"a bit crass"
Pic related, another example of understatement
#194 to #5 - anon (07/07/2015) [-]
is it because he's not driven by greed and is not corrupt?
User avatar #144 to #5 - beltrami (07/07/2015) [-]
better by far? Um, yeah. No.
#103 to #5 - anon (07/06/2015) [-]
meme not Accurate, handfull of shee/po/ support him
User avatar #80 to #5 - capslockrage ONLINE (07/06/2015) [-]
You're objectively wrong, trump is a moron, that is why people hate him.
User avatar #60 to #5 - angelusprimus (07/06/2015) [-]
Yes, lets vote for a man who managed to go into bankrupcy. Twice.
Man who thinks we have china where we want them. Because we owe them money.
Man who thinks we should put 25% tariff on chinese goods (which anyone with any economic background knows would tank our economy completely)
Man who managed to drive a CASINO IN VEGAS into ground.
Yes, that will be best thing we can do for our country's economy.

Anyone who thinks Trump is in any way a good candidate is either an idiot, or never actually googled "Trump"
User avatar #67 to #60 - toosexyforyou (07/06/2015) [-]
>If his going into bankruptcy twice was such a bad thing then why is he so rich?
>Well China won't wage war against a country that owes them trillions of dollars, debt is a good thing for countries. If you understood economics you wouldn't come off as being so stupid talking about it.
>Implying businesses in Vegas don't tank often?
User avatar #73 to #67 - angelusprimus (07/06/2015) [-]
> He is rich, because he uses loopholes in the bancrupcy system to get out of huge debts, while protecting his own assets through fictive corporations. In short, he is rich because we the taxpayers end up covering his debts.
If he did that **** in europe, where people guarantee with all their assets for the ones where they **** up, he'd be a bum.

> Nobody would go to war. What would happen is that china would say ok.
And then they would stop the delivery of materials OUR industry needs. Because over a 1/3 of raw materials for our industry comes from China. There goes our production.
Also, millions of chinese products would dissapear from our stores. basically driving those stores into ground, losing us millions upon millions of jobs.
And then China would start underselling our debt and billions in assets they have, making dollar tank.
Sure, it would **** chinese economy too. But it would devastate ours. Reason why China won't do it, is because trade is their lifeblood. We start ******* their trade, they **** us up.

> Multimilion dollar corporate casinos? No they actually make a lot of money. They go through a circular finance, which means several years they make a lot of money and then for a few they lose. That's because of the tax policies of Nevada. For example, Caesar's has revenues of 8 billion dollars. (yes, with a B) But in 2013 they actually lost nearly 3 billion. Which sounds bad, if you don't know that in 2014 and 2015 they made over 7.
And an complete amateur like me knows that. But Trump actually went into casino business without studying the tax system, and funneled the necessary assets from good years (the cash reserve) into other projects. So when the low year came, casino couldn't pay the tax.
That's called really bad business.
User avatar #112 to #73 - toosexyforyou (07/06/2015) [-]
Such a long and wrong response.
User avatar #142 to #112 - tricher (07/07/2015) [-]
"Such a long and wrong response"

Hmm intresting I suppose you have a counter argument for such a case or else you are just a ******* idiot and I'd hate to think you are a ******* idiot. So go ahead and prove everyone with your counter argument that you are not a ******* idiot instead of just saying wrong you ******* idiot.

SPOILER ALERT He has no argument so what is he...

#26 to #5 - hiddenmastermind ONLINE (07/06/2015) [-]
the man with the plan for Isis, but he won't tell anyone until he becomes President (but he'll hit em hard) it's like he's inspired by a ******* Onion article
#145 to #26 - anon (07/07/2015) [-]
what plan might that be? Stop allowing the CIA to fund them?
User avatar #111 to #26 - ohemgeezus ONLINE (07/06/2015) [-]
Did he actually say that?
"I know the cure for cancer but I won't say unless I'm king of the world :^)"
User avatar #237 to #111 - hiddenmastermind ONLINE (07/07/2015) [-]
oops wrong person
0
#236 to #111 - hiddenmastermind has deleted their comment [-]
#78 to #26 - ogloko (07/06/2015) [-]
in all honesty, why share the plan? i assume ISIS would just prepare themselves accordingly. broadcasting a plan a year in advance of being able to do it isnt very sneaky
#238 to #78 - hiddenmastermind ONLINE (07/07/2015) [-]
he literally said he didnt want Obama to implement it, but he wants to. And be honest, it's Trump, the only thing he's gonna say is "Bomb em back to Allah", especially since he has has no research into the field, no departmental knowledge that the Executive would have and is borderline retarded
#108 to #78 - anon (07/06/2015) [-]
Because it doesnt matter, trumb would just give them orders and issis will obey them just like bush.
User avatar #93 to #78 - ronyx ONLINE (07/06/2015) [-]
That's not how things work
#21 to #5 - bann ONLINE (07/06/2015) [-]
I'm more worried that with all his business interests he'll aim to serve those rather than the people.
User avatar #153 to #21 - durkadurka ONLINE (07/07/2015) [-]
So in other words business as usual?
#75 to #21 - ogloko (07/06/2015) [-]
show me one politician that doesnt seek to serve their private interests
User avatar #50 to #21 - tealcanaan (07/06/2015) [-]
Do a quick google search on Clinton/ Sanders/ The "Indian's" biggest funders and their actual voting records bud. If you think for a second that a bigger, populist government won't help established conglomerates you're naive, just look at Brazil, they will only kill competition with their policies.
User avatar #18 to #5 - europe (07/06/2015) [-]
Yes, let's listen to someone who doesn't know the difference between then and than
#10 to #5 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
"They're rapists, and some - I assume- are good people"

- Trump on Mexicans crossing the border
#17 to #10 - Taromillas (07/06/2015) [-]
It's not that outlandish though, is it? Why would a country thats worse off in every way send their best to make a better country even better? Of course there are scum that are going to slither in and take advantage of the systems set up. It's naive and pretty much stupid to assume otherwise / that every single illegal immigrant is only looking for a good home.
User avatar #36 to #17 - rockamekishiko (07/06/2015) [-]
No one is SENDING **** . People leave by themselves
User avatar #33 to #17 - minorian (07/06/2015) [-]
Wasn't America built by immigrants? Did you just say that America was basically built by the ********* Europe had to offer?
#20 to #17 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
Hint: They aren't sending anyone, people are coming of their own volition for better opportunity. Just like every immigrant in the history of this country. My great grandfather was an illegal immigrant from Italy. You know what he came here to do? Teach violin.
User avatar #27 to #20 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
They could also be looking for a better opportunity to further their criminal ambitions, but lets just ignore that because your grandpa coming from a country with a completely different cultural and social landscape came here to teach violin.

Emotions do not trump logic.
#30 to #27 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
great grandfather. I never knew him so emotions don't come into play.

Can I ask you to please think for one second? Literally every single person in this country who is not full blooded Native American is descended from immigrants within the past 4 centuries, you included. The Chinese Exclusion Act didn't stop Chinese from coning in droves on the West Coast, and the quota system didn't keep out the Irish, Italian and Polish immigrants it was intended to.

Of course, all those people were criminals right? They were coming from less prosperous nations to a more prosperous one! Sure stinks that The Donald wasn't around back then to stop them and likely prevent you from existing.
User avatar #32 to #30 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
Not emotions about your great grandfather, about "muh poor immigrants"

Lets use your example then, that everybody besides the native americans are immigrants. Were the mass majority of the white settlers who came to americans criminals? No. Did the native americans still have their culture and way of life destroyed by a bunch of immigrants who outbred them and refused to assimilate? Yes.

I live in texas. I've seen the areas these illegals have taken over. There in nothing american about them. You see mexican flags flying on us soil and all the shops and signs are in spanish, all the homes are dilapidated and broken down as well. There is no assimilation. They come here to make mini mexicos, and they bring everything mexican with them.

Using your own argument you prove the necessity for a strict immigration policy.
#34 to #32 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
No, I don't. Although using your argument I can prove that you hate the Constitution. Those Mexicans are exerting their right to free speech and free expression. You thinking their maintaining Mexican culture is a reason to exclude them is nothing but cultural Marxism. Do you also think people in Chinatown should be sent back? How about in Little Italy?
#91 to #34 - chronoeagle (07/06/2015) [-]
Have you lived near them? They aren't like immigrants from other countries.
User avatar #35 to #34 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
Thats quite a leap. So observing the fact that mexcian immigrants dont assimiliate and often have shady backgrounds means I hate the constitution? If a bunch of anarchists came to the US, intent on destroying everything american through peaceful means, including the Constitution, would I hate the constitution for advocating that we not let these people in, these people who hate the us and its constitution?

You see you're not a very logical person. Also I had to laugh at the fact that you accuse me of cultural marxism, when the encouragement of immigration is one the tenets of cultual marxism and any other subversive left wing ideology.

The Chinese and the italians assimilated because they were forced too by the society we had at the time, and their respective cultures and nations. When you travel across an ocean to get here youre more willing to adopt a new country and life style, when you walk across a border on a three day trip you're not as inclined.

#38 to #35 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
No, justifying the exclusion of them based on their culture and use of a flag makes you a cultural Marxist and a blatant anti-Constitutionalist. What does the Constitution protect if not that? Cultural Marxism is a lens through which one sees the world, not a political ideology. Trotsky and Stalin were both Marxists, the reason they differed was that they were opposed in what they believed the proper response to the Marxist worldview is. Cultural Marxists believe that all of the differences between the world's people's can be attributed to culture. Tumblrites take this to mean that we should accept everyone and allow their cultures to coexist. People like you take this to mean that immigrants should assimilate their culture or not come at all.

Also I had to laugh at you thinking the Chinese and Italians assimilated. Pic very ******* related, that's Chinatown in Manhattan. There must be something in the water down there in Texas that makes you all this ignorant.
User avatar #42 to #38 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
If the constitution encouraged massive hoards of people who have no love for the us coming into the us and changing us land into the land of their home countries in everything but name the US constitution would be completely destroyed.

Cultural Marxism is the war on culture itself, primarily capitalist culture, which is supposed to be the greatest barrier to the revolution. By flooding the US with people who aren't assimilating, who are eliminating the influence of US culture with their own, you are being a cultural marxist because you are weakening the capitalist american way of life. Internal strife will surely follow. You are a puppet, though like most cultural marxists you don't know it.

Tell me, how many Italians still speak italian or observe italisn holidays? I advise you to look up the death of little italy, the italians you claim aren't assimilating are bitching about the last remnant of their culture getting destroyed by, guess what, immigrants, specifically Jamaican and other black immigrants.

If you are supposed to be enlightened I'll happily be called ignorant
#44 to #42 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
No, Cultural Marxism is what I just told you it was. It's like Social Darwinism, not related to the original in anything but parallelism. Sure, Little Italies (yes, plural. There's one in every major city) are dying, but cultural enclaves are not. Go to the Ironbound in Newark and try to get by without someone who speaks Portuguese. Go to any of the 30 different Chinatowns - or the Little Tokyos and Koreatowns for that matter.

Amerca is not homogenous and it never has been, nor will it be. Mexicans are not changing that, they're merely the most recent addition. And given enough time and proximity, you'll get used to it. Come to New Jersey sometime. I'd like to see your face at the **** ton of Irish and Italian flags flying on every street.
User avatar #47 to #44 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
Sorry, saying "no" doesn'tt change the fact that by making war on capitalist american culture you are doing exactly what cultural marxism strives for, weakening the nation in preparation for a revolution.

You're also comparing peoples that immigrated here en masse in a completely different time period with completely different cultures from completely different geographical locations.

A modern day mexican walking a dat or two across the border and shacking up with his cousin pedro is not the same as traveling across an ocean to a country where everyone demands you assimilate.

The fact that you're calling mexicans a recent addition just proves to me you have zero ******* clue about what you're talking about. This has actually been a problem in southern border states for about 70-60 years, nobody seems to be getting used to their homes and neighborhoods getting taken over by another country unofficially.

I only wish we could force all you bleeding hearts to have the homes you grew up in destroyed and have every one around you speak a different language and make you feel like a stranger in your own country. Then we can just tell you to "get used to it" hahaha
#129 to #47 - mayoroftownsville (07/07/2015) [-]
As I mentioned, Cultural Marxism does not 'strive' for anything. It's a point of view, not an ideology. Cultural Marxism is like a telescope. Two people look through it and see approaching aliens. One decides to welcome the aliens and the other decides to prepare for a fight. In this analogy I'm the one who climbs to the top and peels off the sticker from the lens.

Making more points about how the Mexicans will never assimilate doesn't do anything to sway me because I actually believe in freedom. It's no skin off my back if they do or if they don't, and even if it bothered me I wouldn't want the government to intervene (same way I feel about the confederate flag). 60-70 years is recent. Within that timeframe only the Hmong and the Koreans have had major immigration movements to the U.S., and both of those have ended.

Was the home you grew up in destroyed? Also I've lived in the Ironbound, I know exactly what it feels like to have everyone around me speak another language. Feels like freedom.
User avatar #37 to #35 - rockamekishiko (07/06/2015) [-]
are you stupid? No one comes here to destroy anything. You're delusional.
TONS of Mexicans assimilate into US culture, cultures are not that different to begin with. Main differences is that Mexicans like to listen to loud music and drink till 5 in the morning on Mexican holidays. That and food is pretty much it.
User avatar #39 to #37 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
oh, so what i see everyday as i drive through the old neighborhoods are just delusions.

the majority of them are assimilating, the mini mexicos im looking at are just hallucinations

the main differences between us culture and mexican culture is drinking and food

getting called stupid by you is a compliment
User avatar #41 to #39 - rockamekishiko (07/06/2015) [-]
That last sentence doesn't make any sense but ok.
What do you see in these "mini mexicos"?
User avatar #43 to #41 - youregaylol (07/06/2015) [-]
If a fool calls me stupid its because I disagree with him, and disagreeing with a fool more often than not means that I'm not a fool as well.

" I've seen the areas these illegals have taken over. There in nothing american about them. You see mexican flags flying on us soil and all the shops and signs are in spanish, all the homes are dilapidated and broken down as well. There is no assimilation. They come here to make mini mexicos, and they bring everything mexican with them."
#11 to #10 - MuahahaOfLore (07/06/2015) [-]
put it in context

He was referring to illegals not Mexicans
User avatar #46 to #11 - greyhoundfd (07/06/2015) [-]
Most of the illegals still are only criminals in the sense that they're here illegally. The vast majority of illegal immigrants come here to work and live because the conditions in Mexico are so poor, they aren't criminals. Hell, the criminals are probably more inclined to stay in Mexico because it's easier to get away with crimes there.
#49 to #46 - anon (07/06/2015) [-]
you sound racist against mexico
User avatar #51 to #49 - greyhoundfd (07/06/2015) [-]
Mexico as a country is a piece of **** . It is dirt poor, crime-ridden, and corrupt. I have nothing against Mexicans or Hispanics, but the countries they tend to come from are utter ********* . Personally, I think we should let more in and increase education initiatives to ensure that we have a lot more manpower available in this country. We don't want to turn into Japan, with the majority of our workforce disappearing because we have too little immigration and people are hitting retirement.
User avatar #56 to #51 - misterpinkle (07/06/2015) [-]
"Maybe, if we allow enough immigrants into the States, we can get the factories back!"

~Michiganders
User avatar #58 to #56 - greyhoundfd (07/06/2015) [-]
In theory, if everyone else in the world immigrated to America we would get the factories back.
User avatar #61 to #58 - misterpinkle (07/06/2015) [-]
Hey, the D needs a hand up; we need all the help we can get at this point. Mexico would be a good start.
User avatar #40 to #11 - failtolawl (07/06/2015) [-]
so you are saying that illegal immigrants are not mexican? Then where are most of them from?
User avatar #96 to #40 - ronyx ONLINE (07/06/2015) [-]
Latin America exists, pick up a geographic book lol.
User avatar #128 to #96 - failtolawl (07/07/2015) [-]
Then where are most of them from?

most
User avatar #143 to #128 - ronyx ONLINE (07/07/2015) [-]
Illegals from Mexico have decreased, the rest come from various countries from south america. Jesus christ don't they teach this stuff in middle school?
#16 to #11 - mayoroftownsville (07/06/2015) [-]
Nobody would have assumed otherwise...
#7 to #5 - anon (07/06/2015) [-]
Than*
#8 to #7 - MuahahaOfLore (07/06/2015) [-]
Thanks!
 Friends (0)